Geoffrey Fox:


In the Native American Film and Video Festival held at the Museum of the American Indian in New York City, September 1995, one of the video artists was a short man with a feather headband and geometric patterns painted across his face who let it be known through a chain of interpreters-- from his language to Portuguese to Spanish and English -- how uncomfortable he was wearing pants and shoes.

He had brought his videos from the forest of northern Brazil, near the Surinam border, where the remnants of once-larger pre-Columbian groups had fled Brazilian road-builders and prospectors to constitute a new tribe.

Brazilian anthropologists had introduced the videocam, and the tribe decided that he, their traditional story-teller, should document their dances and rites.

Now, by his images and (multiply-translated) words, he brought before an international audience in New York his critique of the urban culture his people insisted on rejecting.

Other people from the "margins" of the America's urban cultures are using the new information technology in equally surprising ways.
The Mayan rebels of the Ejercito Zapatista de Liberacion Nacional inform the whole world of their positions and have even conducted an international poll on what their policies should be, through the internet.
Rural communities in Colombia are recovering, or perhaps inventing, traditional stories through filmed or videotaped dramatizations, Native Canadians transmit local and international news, greetings and cultural programs, in all their native languages, via TV satellite, and so on.

Christine Boyer is quite right: the old categories of "center" and "periphery," "First World" and "Third World," and even the rapidly aging category of "postmodern" no longer help to explain anything.

Saskia Sassen has also made the point, though not in this intervention, that North America is becoming "Latinized" or even "Third-Worldized," as conditions of exploitation of cheap labor long familiar in Latin America are reproduced in the sweatshops of Los Angeles, New York, Chicago and the border towns;
at the same time, overseas investment in Latin America by North American, European and Asian firms creates pockets of relatively high-wage, high-technology industry that destabilizes the economies of surrounding areas, stimulating urban and international migration and further confusing the distinctions between Latin American and North American ways of life.

As Tom Angotti points out forcefully, the sharpest contradictions today are not between a neocolonial Latin America and a hegemonic North America, but between those with greater wealth, power and information access and those with less.

What is new and potentially disruptive of the old patterns of exploitation is that wealth, power (e.g., political and military) and information access are not necessarily correlated.
Information technology is becoming cheaper, more widely available, and more effective -- farther reaching and faster -- all the time. With only a little assistance from outside groups, such as the Brazilian anthropologists with a videocam or Subcomandante Marcos of the Zapatistas and his familiarity with computers, or artists who hand out cheap cameras to slum children in Washington, DC, or Bogota, this technology reaches the hands of people who have a startlingly different sort of information to convey. The lack of a decent formal education in reading and writing is no serious obstacle for those working with sound and images; in fact, people without such formal education often grasp the potentialities of the new media faster than those with it. And the internet, which still consists mostly of written text (though this is changing), may turn out to be the most effective way to encourage people to overcome any deficits they have in literacy.
Nor does depriving a favela or barrio of telephone lines create an insuperable obstacle to communications in the age of cellular telephony and other technologies still emerging.

I do not believe that information equals power -- there are too many ignorant tyrants for us to believe that oversimplified equation -- but access to information, and to the ability to impart information, is a resource that can be used to gain power.
The Zapatistas have used it to gain popular support throughout Mexico and the world, other "Indians" of the Americas use it to defend their communities and to prepare them to deal with the outside world, and everybody -- even those whose access to the new technology is limited to watching the programming on O Globo -- becomes aware of alternative ways of life and the existence of distant cities, destroying the ignorance and isolation which have always been the first line of defense of despotism.




ÿ